View Single Post
Old 04-14-2010, 03:15 AM   #18
Fat Abe
Man Who Stares at Books
Fat Abe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fat Abe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fat Abe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fat Abe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fat Abe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fat Abe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fat Abe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fat Abe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fat Abe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fat Abe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fat Abe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Fat Abe's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,826
Karma: 10606722
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: 50th State, USA. Also, PA, NY, CA, and elsewhere.
Device: All of the Above
Three standard math programs which engineers and scientists use are Mathematica, Matlab and Mathcad. Each has its own syntax. Favoring MathML as a standard would upset the other two vendors. When you throw in spreadsheet software or even a standard language like Fortran or C, you have another can of worms, due to function naming.

None of the three core programs displays equations in a pretty format, not even for simple matrices. That would involve another standard, with "typesetting" thrown into the consideration. Since any given equation can result in a number of renderings, where do you stop the process of "beautifying" the resulting graphic image? This is why I always spend a lot of time adjusting the positions of symbols when I write a technical paper. I know, this is terribly backward. It leads to errors, since an author may have already validated an equation in his/her math app, only to see a sign added/omitted in the published version, which he probably generated in a word processing app. And don't expect a reviewer to catch the error. It's frustrating.
Fat Abe is offline   Reply With Quote