Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonist
Well. it may be a test, or it may be something inserted by the developer. But it was indicative of the experience. Not a good one, IMO.
|
It wasnt a test! Apples iAd system only works under software 4.0 which I doubt you have as its not released to the general public yet.
so your saying that based on an ad that had nothing to do with Apple that iAd adverts will be bad! your experience was no more indicative of what iAd ads will be like than me test driving a Toyota Corrola and saying ferraris are rubbish! or your just saying any adverts are bad?(I do tend to agree) maybe iAds will be less bad as Apple will regulate how intrusive they are and also regulate what they are adverts for. we dont really know yet except for the mock ups Apple showed which for an advert didnt look worse than anything else I have ever seen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonist
As to Flash-less versions of sites, these have been around since mobile browsers came to be. But saying it's a" non issue" is like saying that being banned from accessing regular books is a non-issue, because you can read the Cliffs Notes versions. Very 1984.
|
Yes they have but im not talking about mobile versions Im talking about the fact that many web sites are now starting to be EXACTLY the same either with flash or without(so more like reading exactly the same book on an ereader instead of on paper! or on recycled paper instead of new, nothing like a different version or cliff notes) once the vast majority of sites work like that well yes it will be a non issue. until then it is an issue.