[Logseman]

We must say something and have it quite clear: open source stifles innovation. The strength of open source projects lies on its userbase. OSo projects must adapt themselves to the current userbase they have, unlike copyrighted software which forces a much bigger turnover and replaceability since its idea is to profit on its patent which eventually wears off. I believe it's a good idea to compare an open-source oriented device like the Netronix ones, particularly the 600, with the Sony PRS-505 device. While the latter was discontinued and is sorely missed by many users who don't feel the newer model (the PRS-600) is quite as good, the Netronix model has been hanging around for four years, seemingly pleasing users as its dozens of rebrands around the world can give proof of, now the latest iteration being the Kobo device. While the PRS-505 outlived its usefulness for Sony and got replaced, the EB600 has lived longer precisely because it's useful.

The iPad is just as far away from the concept of Open Source as they make them. It has branded itself explicitly as an "enhancement" more than a stand-alone device. People buy it with the assumption and conviction that it will be dated in months when a new little thing is added to the carcass. It is not just consumption electronics: it's something in a deeper level.