Quote:
|
I dont get the hate for non open source. is it because Apple in particular are being successful with a non open source methodology?
|
Not specially. It's because closed source models only work with copyright enforcement, and deprive the consumer of their power of choice. I like my iPod touch, but if the battery happens to die, I'm screwed about it. My washing machine works fine, but if it gets broken I have no way to repair it. On the other side, I like my Pocketbook, and if the battery gets screwed I can throw it away, zap another one and keep using it, though I am still as much of a dunce concerning batteries as before. Open source encourages modular models: if one piece is defective, it can be replaced for another one and the same machine keeps working. Closed source models use a "take no prisoners" mentality, and if something's wrong inside of them your only option is to turn it back and get a replacement. Closed source alienates the device from its owner, so much that it's doubtful that he's an owner anymore but a licensee.