View Single Post
Old 04-04-2010, 10:29 PM   #97
PKFFW
Wizard
PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,791
Karma: 33500000
Join Date: Dec 2008
Device: BeBook, Sony PRS-T1, Kobo H2O
Quote:
Originally Posted by riemann42 View Post
I am mildly offended that my position is categorized as being in favor of Big Media. I am in favor of a legal framework that encouraged authors and artists to participate in a system to insure that they are compensated.
Don't worry too much about it riemann, anyone who disagrees with DF is categoried as a big media shill. I wouldn't take it personally.
Quote:
Originally Posted by riemann42
Also, I would argue that considering Digital Content different than physical content is not new and radical. I argue that considering said property to be equivalent to physical property is what is radical. Software sales have long since created a wealth of case law on this issue, but as IANAL.
Seems ironic to me to that on the one hand many argue digital media is different to physical property and should be treated differently when it comes to creators rights and copyright infringement but then they argue it should be treated the same when it comes to their right of resale.

An interesting duality I think.

Cheers,
PKFFW
PKFFW is offline   Reply With Quote