View Single Post
Old 04-04-2010, 06:23 PM   #108
stustaff
Wizard
stustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it is
 
Posts: 1,055
Karma: 2110
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Derbyshire UK
Device: sony reader PRS505 and 600
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon View Post
Sony have the right to, however in practice I can think of ONE case where they did it, and frankly the devs were being asshats. Apple do it on a regular basis, and they don't have any sort of screening process. Not the same at all. It's simply factually incorrect to say that the treatment of devs is in any way equal between the two application processes.

I say this as someone who's experienced both, I'd add.

And wow, another brilliant defence of "corporate rights", "bend over and do what we say". Sigh. (And yes, their criteria ARE secret, in part. This is a good part of the issue!)
Yet people still choose to make apps! isnt that weird in fact more apps than for any other equivalent device or in fact all other devices added together.

its swings and roundabouts i guess.

the point is people know all of that dawnfalcon and I would defend Apples rights to do whatever they choose on a device they make and sell!

No one has to buy an iPhone or program for the iPhone if people were unhappy enough then they would do neither and apple would start making more open devices.

However the market and apples success seems to say that as far as the majority are concerned tehy couldnt care less about walled gardens.
stustaff is offline   Reply With Quote