View Single Post
Old 03-31-2010, 04:05 PM   #21
EatingPie
Blueberry!
EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.EatingPie puts his or her pants on both legs at a time.
 
EatingPie's Avatar
 
Posts: 888
Karma: 133343
Join Date: Mar 2007
Device: Sony PRS-500 (RIP); PRS-600 (Good Riddance); PRS-505; PRS-650; PRS-350
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotbob View Post
See, now the rumor I heard is that she doesn't think that reading it as an ebook is the right "experience" of reading a book. Although, I guess she feels listening to some one read it from a CD recording is.
This would be an opposition to e-Books in general, then.

If you ever read any e-Reader thread on Ars Technica, you get people bitching and complaining that they lose the tactile feel of a book when you go "e". In almost every case, none have used or even seen a Kindle (et. al.), and it just comes down to anti-technology bitching -- the site used to live up to the name "Art of Technology," but not so much any more.

Before e-Readers, I was in full agreement with the "tactile" issue, particularly in terms of eye strain. Now, you can sure argue the Kindle doesn't feel like a book, but you're really on very thin ice saying that it's degraded the experience way beyond its paper counterparts. So, once again, I can see Rowling's point -- five years ago! But it's no longer valid.

-Pie

Last edited by EatingPie; 03-31-2010 at 04:14 PM.
EatingPie is offline   Reply With Quote