View Single Post
Old 03-30-2010, 04:56 PM   #44
PKFFW
Wizard
PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,791
Karma: 33500000
Join Date: Dec 2008
Device: BeBook, Sony PRS-T1, Kobo H2O
Ok, since I haven't figured out how to add you to ignore yet(where is the damn ignore button?) let me answer one more time..........
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
No, and it's not what I said either. You stated that people shouldn't have the right, of course, purely and simply because it's hard on the companies.
So I make things up hey?

Please quote where I posted that people shouldn't have the right?

You can't can you? That's because I have never stated that. That is simply a lie you made up because it was easy and convenient for you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
This is a lie.
Do you know what a lie is?

1: I stated that what you posted seems to me to be agreement. As I am stating what it seems to me, it is not a lie. At very worst I may have misinterpreted your remark but I don't think so.
2: You were the one that stated "that's the great thing about sarcasm". So if you believe it is great that sarcasm is rhetorical and argumentative doesn't it follow that you are agreeing that your sarcastic comments are argumentative and rhetorical?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
That is not what you have typed. You are advocating stripping people's rights simply because of the medium.
Firstly, please link or quote where I stated anyone should be "stripped" of their rights. Can't do it? Of course not, because your claim that I did is simply another lie.

Secondly, I gave you the definition of advocating. Advocating means one is speaking in support of something.

Simply stating that one believes situation X will follow from situation Y without stating either way if that chain of events is good or bad does not constitute "advocating".

There are some good English schools in the UK. You should look into attending some classes in order to get a better understanding of the language rather than using big words you don't understand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
UK/EU Consumer law works fine. You want to break it because it's inconvenient for companies. Understandably, there are people less than keen on that.
Whoop de doo da dee...........

Your response here in no way addresses my point but that doesn't surprise me as that is your usual way of arguing when you don't really have any valid point.

If you truly believe consumers will not have to change at all in the digital age then good for you. I suggest you get on your big fluffy pink elephant and bound off to have tea with the fairies as that is where you so obviously belong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
This is a lie. I advocate Baen as where the book industry can pick up a lot of tips, and music retailers as where they can get a few.
It is not a lie, you have used the music industry as an analogy before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
Say, what's your RIAA membership number?
And what a surprise, you don't really have any valid discussion points in response to my points so you bring out the old RIAA membership number line.

Will Godwins law be invoked next?

Now off to work out how to add lunatics to the ignore list!

Cheers,
PKFFW
PKFFW is offline   Reply With Quote