Quote:
Originally Posted by WT Sharpe
Ralph Sir Edward, sir,
Do you only see what you want to see?
|
Looked at the photo again. Labeled "climatechangeskeptics".
Three people with their heads in the sand with the global warming "hockey stick" chart in the "missing man" position.
Seems to me it was a laugh at global warming skeptics. What did I miss?
Tree rings seem not to reflect the full impact of recent warming (2009). So...maybe they didn't reflect the full impact of previous warmings? Did the ice cores correlate with the tree rings? If so, are they subject to the same bias? If not, why was this discrepancy not noted, in order to provide cross-check between different data sources?
Any time I ask questions like this, it's like watching a Fundamentalist Baptist going after an atheist....