Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
There is a clear and consistent institutional bias against epaper which comes from Engadget and Gizmodo, though, which along with the constant stream of basic factual errors they make renders their "reviews" of epaper devices essentially ranting rather than anything informative.
There are plenty of other sites which have better reviews, and it's those we should pay attention to.
|
This is your personal opinion. Pretty much all similar sites will have some errors. The real question is whether they give enough information to help the reader. I think that much of the time they do.
As to your perceived bias, it may be that you are simply mistaking their desire to give the readers as much information about problems as they can on products; as an instututional bias. I know that I have not recognized this bias on their part: though I do have to say I don't read them all the time.
Lastly, I think we all should have the right to use whatever sources we want, and not be restricted to the ones you want us to use. Or even the ones that I like as we all know that my picks are the best.
