Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenophon
Nor would any reading of that article* be complete without reading Lomborg's response, which you can find in full at his web site. It's also worth looking around for other articles on Scientific American's treatment of Lomborg's book. They, um... weren't very scientific.
Xenophon
* better called a cynical hatchet job than an article, IMHO.
|
They pointed that out in the follow-up; not to mention giving Lomborg quite a bit of space to respond within their own magazine. They were more than fair with him, and I felt his responses to his critics fell flat.