View Single Post
Old 03-18-2010, 01:46 PM   #4215
Xenophon
curmudgeon
Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Xenophon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,487
Karma: 5748190
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Redwood City, CA USA
Device: Kobo Aura HD, (ex)nook, (ex)PRS-700, (ex)PRS-500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WT Sharpe View Post
No reading of The Skeptical Environmentalist by Bjørn Lomborg (a statistician and political scientist; not a climatologist) would be complete without a reading of the article “Misleading Math about the Earth: Science defends itself against The Skeptical Environmentalist” from the January 2002 issue of Scientific American.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...math-about-the
Nor would any reading of that article* be complete without reading Lomborg's response, which you can find in full at his web site. It's also worth looking around for other articles on Scientific American's treatment of Lomborg's book. They, um... weren't very scientific.

Xenophon

* better called a cynical hatchet job than an article, IMHO.
Xenophon is offline   Reply With Quote