View Single Post
Old 07-25-2007, 12:55 PM   #43
tribble
iLiad Maniac
tribble knows what time it istribble knows what time it istribble knows what time it istribble knows what time it istribble knows what time it istribble knows what time it istribble knows what time it istribble knows what time it istribble knows what time it istribble knows what time it istribble knows what time it is
 
tribble's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,382
Karma: 2369
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Germany
Device: Bookeen Opus (i love that thing) and iPad (what an irony)
Quote:
Originally Posted by donovanh View Post
Edit: I wonder.. is the reader a "nontrivial device"?
Probably not, but the plane definately is

Quote:
They concluded that this is "busted." Their tests caused no interference to a small airplane's avionics, but did so to unshielded equipment. They concluded that interference could occur aboard an aircraft if the shielding was not working correctly."
Either thats a typo or incongruent.

And for all you people who love rules, dont be afraid, i probably wont be sitting on a plane with you. And if i am, dont worry either. Since my iLiad is WiFi capable, i will gladly turn it off during start and landing, and if only so my neighbour doesnt get scared.

Nevertheless i think its a stupid rule and i dont believe that a nontransmitting device can bring down any standard aircraft. I remember when i was sitting in an airplane during descend, and while looking out of the window seeing flames burst from the turbine. I guess that was alot more dangerous than if all the people aboard where reading on their ereaders.

I guess i am just not so scared anymore. Can happen to people who deal a bit with statistics
tribble is offline   Reply With Quote