Quote:
Originally Posted by TGS
In the short time that I have been coming here I find that I disagree with almost everything kennyc says. I also don't think there is anything either he or I could say that would bring about any kind of rapprochement whereby we would speak with one voice on the issues upon which we disagree. Sometimes I don't like the way he says things. For all that I don't think kennyc should be censored - if I am right in thinking that what's the reference to influencing moderators' views amounts to. If kennyc, or anyone else, says something that I disagree with or object to I have a number of choices - I can respond, I can choose not to respond, I can choose not to read their contributions, I could even get a life and stop following the discussions and contributions that wind me up quite so closely.
|
I rather thought I should give my support to people I agree with, that's why I wrote. In my case using 'ignore' boils down to practical reasons: sometimes I can't stop myself from replying to remarks about copyright infringement and theft and the whole debate begins again. When I can't see his posts, I'm not tempted to reply - and if someone cites them, in agreement, I can then discuss the matter with someone else whom I might influence, or who might give me some reasoning, not based on
truthiness that would convince me.