View Single Post
Old 03-12-2010, 08:54 PM   #64
charleski
Wizard
charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,196
Karma: 1281258
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-505
Anyone who can't craft a simple regexp to fix the problems you describe has no business taking money from a publisher to create ebooks in the first place. I'd say that in reality A epubcheck has done us all a favour by exposing his incompetence and getting him fired .

No-one is saying that epubcheck is enough on its own. If you only have a limited amount of time, then sure, there are other ways of testing that should take precedence. But I have to take you back to my first reply to this thread - epubcheck is about future-proofing. What happens in 5 years' time when some xhtml standards committee decides that the 'name' attribute now specifies the number of sparkly lights to surround a character? Publishers need to take the long-view. They need to minimise the chance that they'll have to spend a ton of money in the future getting someone to correct a ton of errors that shouldn't have been made in the first place.
charleski is offline   Reply With Quote