View Single Post
Old 03-02-2010, 05:03 PM   #26
bobcdy
Fanatic
bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bobcdy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
bobcdy's Avatar
 
Posts: 527
Karma: 1048576
Join Date: May 2009
Device: bebook; prs-950; nook simple touch; HTC Jetstream tablet
Usually when starting with a Project Gutenberg text file, I open it with Word 2003, correct spelling, etc., enter the html tags, and save it as a utf-8 text. I then open it with Notepad++ and save it as an html file. Finally, I open it with Sigil 0.1.9 and save as epub. Sigil has automatically split all the chapters for the epub so when I open it with Sigil 0.2.0 all the files are present.

If I open the html file with Sigil 0.2.0 then save it as epub, when I close and reopen it, the html file has not be split into chapters, style sheets, etc. and the html file is the only file present. It is not a proper epub, and on reopening it with Sigil 0.1.9 I find that the styles have been deleted. With Sigil 0.2.0 I must somehow split the file into chapters, style sheet, images, etc. - but how do I do this? How do I even know what files are necessary?

As a dedicated Sigil 0.1.9 user, it appears on first use that Sigil has lost the advantage it had with the simple interface of the previous version, and now there is only a small advantage to using Sigil compared to simply starting from scratch with an html file, splitting it manually into the proper files, and zipping the final result.
bobcdy is offline   Reply With Quote