View Single Post
Old 03-02-2010, 11:47 AM   #32
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,138
Karma: 315558334
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon View Post
Okay, restate: Not all unauthorised copying is illegal. There is unauthorised copying which falls into the scope of fair use/dealing, some falls into illegal/unenforceable EULA's and some in the UK which can't be prosecuted.

This is distinctly different from an offence such as theft, which is always illegal.
I can go along with all that (with minor quibbles I won't bother with.)

But you seem to have missed my point, (or you disagree with me), that there's some illegal unauthorised copying which is more illegal than others. For me, that class includes obtaining a unauthorised copy of a digital file, rather than anything to do with personal use of an authorised copy.

And it is for these acts that I feel the term "copyright infringement", although technically correct, isn't sufficient as it fails to make this distinction.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote