View Single Post
Old 03-01-2010, 02:21 PM   #147
dmaul1114
Wizard
dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,300
Karma: 1121709
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Amazon Kindle 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy View Post
So what would be the legal definition of a legit site vs a non-legit site?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy View Post
How is a downloader supposed to know whether the host they are getting content from is authorized? Isn't this the exact same situation?

Pick a link at random from google and download the data to your hard drive. Did you just commit a criminal act? How would you even know?
Ok, fair enough. I agree that's very tricky and I'm willing to concede that it's going to be hard to go after the downloaders.

But I throw all my support behind making uploading copyrighted material a crime, and having a large, federal agency (or requiring each state to have their own agency) to enforce the laws. Again, with penalties not being absurd. Just MSRP +25% or something for each time the file they uploaded was downloaded etc.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy View Post
Actually, courts have ruled on this for software, in favor of the consumer.

Doesn't matter what a contract or license says, it can't take away consumer's rights. It's not against the law to try and do so, but such terms have no teeth.
Yet there's still plenty of software I use that can be licensed to only 1 or 2 machines, or only my one account etc.

So I don't see e-books being licensed to one account being any different legally.

As long as it's clear and up front consumers aren't losing any rights. I don't like it, but that's just the way it is until the courts rule otherwise and say nothing can be sold as a license etc.
dmaul1114 is offline   Reply With Quote