Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
I'm not quoting argument direct no. It's pointless without the background you've admitted don't have - it starts arcane and gets worse from there. The major, single, most clear, visible and damming evidence is that said editor simply doesn't exist in this day and age. It's 2010, not 1990!
|
You do realize that your position is bound to be unconvincing without direct argument?
I don't see how I don't have the requisite background. What you need is an explanation of the nature of CSS and/or its relation to (X)HTML that explains the situation. I know CSS and XHTML, and I have plenty of experience using WYSIWYG editors for other tasks, so I can follow along. That I don't have that much experience with WYSIWYG web editors doesn't mean I can't follow an argument for why the nature of CSS and XHTML makes one impossible, at least for the needs of the kind of casual user you see yourself as championing.
So fill me in please.