Thread: Murdoch's paywalls are 'antithetical to everything' claims Guardian's Rusbridger
View Single Post
Old 02-27-2010, 07:50 PM   #23
fugazied
Wizard
fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.
 
fugazied's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,305
Karma: 1958
Join Date: Jan 2009
Device: iPod Touch
The guardian probably obtain 50% of it's material from Murdoch news sources anyway lol.

The main problem for online newspapers and news outlets is that 'someone' always offers it for free and makes money from CPM/CPC advertising on the traffic that comes to the websites. Pay content only works for high demand niche sites like the wallstreet journal.
fugazied is offline   Reply With Quote