View Single Post
Old 02-23-2010, 11:29 AM   #5
zerospinboson
"Assume a can opener..."
zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
zerospinboson's Avatar
 
Posts: 755
Karma: 1942109
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Local Cluster
Device: iLiad v2, DR1000
Another book that seems to be more or less in the same league as this, only from an economic perspective, and paying much more attention to innovation rather than creative work creation, is this book, Against intellectual Monopoly.
I can't quite get a feel for what Johns's approach is, but the point Boldrin & Levine make is deceptively simple: Monopolies stifle innovation, patents make sure competitors have to invest more to create a me-too product (because of the broadness of the notion of what a patent is), and only competition drives innovation. (I mention this book in part because they also discuss this sheet music pirate.)
While piracy plays a role on the sidelines, there isn't an industry that can't manage without IPRs; the only thing is they want higher profit margins.

Last edited by zerospinboson; 02-23-2010 at 12:02 PM.
zerospinboson is offline   Reply With Quote