Quote:
Originally Posted by Velcro_SP
Well, if the flamers have to open fire on someone I'd guess I'd rather it be me than Mel47, who didn't seem to deserve it either. All she did, judging by her comments, was buy a Cherrypal Bing and post that she liked it.
Now, ardeegee, the specific words you put in quotes above were not said by me. You're paraphrasing (I disagree with it because I'd refer to censorship as something done by government, not a website exercising a judgment call as to potentially libelous comments by participants). You really should make it clearer when you paraphrase.
If my legal interpretation were such a joke and you were so much more clever than I, you would have pointed out where I was incorrect. There's much more to libel particularly e-libel than what I said, no doubt, but so far as I went, I feel pretty confident that I am right and you are wrong. If there's a joke here, it's your incivility and unfounded accusations.
|
1.) The mild responses here don't even come close to approaching "flaming"
2.) Your original post is still here, it is damned obvious I was paraphrasing
3.) If you try to present to any court as "libel" someone saying that someone
who is anonymous and identified only as a pseudonym on a web forum, in no way tracing back to any real person or any other web forum is "harmed" by being accused of possibly being a liar or a shill in any way
much less to a degree justifying legal action you are going to be laughed out of court, and possibly fined for wasting the legal system's time.