Quote:
Originally Posted by TGS
So now she characterizes her novel as mixing, and has acknowledged her sources (apparently six pages of them - which doesn't suggest she simply took large chunks of some other persons work and called them her own, but actually "mixed" strings of words from a variety of sources - including her own head), the book can be judged on its literary merits, wouldn't you agree?
|
Are you slow or what? The book was published with NO ACKNOWLEDGMENT of sources. That is plagiarism. The large sections copied were verbatim not a word or sentence here or there.