View Single Post
Old 07-08-2007, 10:56 AM   #13
rlauzon
Wizard
rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.
 
rlauzon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
That sounds like an absolutely extraordinary law to me - it makes "bargain hunting" into a crime, from what you're saying! If I see something for sale for $10 and I think that it's really worth $20, I'm committing a crime by only paying $10 for it?
No. The intent was to prevent experts from paying $5 for a $5,000,000 piece of art.

If an expert saw the painting for $5. Let the owner know the real value, then offered by buy it immediately for $4,000,000, that wouldn't be a problem.
rlauzon is offline   Reply With Quote