View Single Post
Old 07-08-2007, 06:04 AM   #6
rlauzon
Wizard
rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.
 
rlauzon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
This whole Blackmask/Conde Nast thing just shows that the real threat to the media industry is itself - not the "pirates".

Something else comes to mind, though:
If I was an art dealer and I saw a Van Gogh at a garage sale for $5, according to the law, if I purchased the painting for $5, I would be committing a crime. The intent of the law is that I know that the painting is worth far more than $5 and that by paying only $5 I would be defrauding the people who are selling the painting.

Now, what's the difference between that and the Content Cartel paying (effectively) peanuts to get the rights to some content?
rlauzon is offline   Reply With Quote