View Single Post
Old 02-19-2010, 06:06 PM   #128
delphidb96
Wizard
delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.delphidb96 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,999
Karma: 300001
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Citrus Heights, California
Device: TWO Kindle 2s, one each Bookeen Cybook Gen3, Sony PRS-500, Axim X51V
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Thornton View Post
Just to be clear, I wouldn't go to the darknets for a book that was on sale as an ebook for which I didn't own a dead tree copy ...

... but this is still not theft. It's making an unauthorised copy. In my view, it's wrong in this case, because the book has been made available and the author has not yet been paid. But it still isn't theft - that's simply the wrong word for what is going on.
Authors write novels for various reasons, but they *submit* to publishers (dead-tree or electronic) specifically to receive money. The publishers print the books or create e-books in order to *sell* the novels to readers. This is a commercial transaction. Taking the e-book without paying for it after it is made available on a retail site for the specific purpose of reading it is NOT just making an unauthorized copy, it's theft.

Making an unauthorized copy is photocopying or scanning it to keeping it around after the original is returned - say after borrowing the copy from a friend or a library.

There *is* a difference.

Derek
delphidb96 is offline   Reply With Quote