Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
I'm going to suggest you re-read the actual ruling and much of the commentary around it. ANY EULA. It's quite clear. (And is going to end up in the supreme court, I'm sure, sooner or later)
What you said was PK's argument. The Judge ignored it and ruled broadly. |
PK's argument was that the defendant was the owner and the judge didn't agree, that's not what I'm talking about.