Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy
Narrow reading? The court specifically stated that Section 117 didn't apply because they weren't the owner.
|
Yes, "narrow reading" because I believe you're neglecting your
de facto lack of ownership over just about anything you've ever purchased in digital form. My specific example (recall I compared it to the
Kindle's ToS) relies on the following:
Quote:
|
Use of Digital Content. Upon your payment of the applicable fees set by Amazon, Amazon grants you the non-exclusive right to keep a permanent copy of the applicable Digital Content and to view, use, and display such Digital Content an unlimited number of times, solely on the Device or as authorized by Amazon as part of the Service and solely for your personal, non-commercial use. Digital Content will be deemed licensed to you by Amazon under this Agreement unless otherwise expressly provided by Amazon.
|
You have a license to the book. No more.
For serious now, I'll leave this in the capable hands of others.