Quote:
Originally Posted by LDBoblo
Actually if you read my previous post, I said it is regardless of where the inconsistency comes from.
|
Which is a completely unreasonable position, which I highlighted with my 2-factor test above. Watch:
"LDBoblo is a pathological liar."
"No, I'm not!"
"Well, sorry, that's an inconsistency therefore your claims are automatically suspect!"
"But I'M the one being described, the source!"
"Yeah, but I'm a second-hand 'regardless of where' the inconsistent info comes from, so there."
"Dammit."
You're entitled to be as mistrusting as you want to be, I suppose, but it this particular rationale isn't convincing.