The issue is that you are contrasting empirical evidence versus subjective experience.
I'm merely stating: a) Causes of eyestrain; b) How another technology empirically mitigates that.
...to balance a similar list geared expressly towards e-ink, which, I notice, you're not going after. I appreciate you at least qualifying it as personal experience, but that's all it is.
For example, "Causes of water boiling" a) Molecules are excited; b1) Via convection; b2) via microwave bombardment
You're essentially saying, "Water that is boiled by convection tastes different so clearly microwave bombardment doesn't boil water."
As for the refresh rate issue, as you say, it's just as present in artificial lighting for reflection based technology and the truism that "doesn't mean you won't have problems" doesn't further the discussion (because one can just as easily say, "Just because you're using e-ink in daylight doesn't mean you won't have problems") in any empirical way... so why stack the deck when conversing?
|