[Teddman]

Originally Posted by kjk

Well, the article generated some reasonable discussions about the issue, without getting too contentious or becoming an LCD vs. eInk battle...oh wait.. http://ireaderreview.com/2010/02/12/...-the-ny-times/

That blog does raise some good points though. It's confusing as to what the article is actually saying about reading off various types of screens and its headline doesn't fit the subject matter.

I do think it's worth posing the question as to what motivation the New York Times would have to downplay the readability advantage of e-ink--when their newpaper was the primary showcase for the iPad's digital periodical reader features.