View Single Post
Old 02-12-2010, 03:45 AM   #9
llreader
Mesmerist
llreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.llreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.llreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.llreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.llreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.llreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.llreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.llreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.llreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.llreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.llreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
llreader's Avatar
 
Posts: 331
Karma: 506558
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Spain
Device: PRS-600 Silver. Much nicer than I expected.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Thornton View Post
I doubt that they'll notice - your letter was excellent.

I just can't help noticing fewer/less because it's one of my wife's pet peeves - one often hears shouts of "FEWER!" at the television in our house, as they (even the BBC nowadays) get it wrong again.

Of course, if enough people get it "wrong", it becomes right, because language evolves over time. Probably a sign of my old age
It is an interesting distinction. I think the way the term "resources" is often used is not as a plural noun, but as a large pool of fungible capacity, like a pudding. "We are going to put less of our pudding in the cup and more in the bowl". It doesn't make sense grammatically, but it does under the alternate conceptual paradigm. Like, say, "the waters of life", it/they are not treated as a collection of individual entities but as a homogeneous mass.
llreader is offline   Reply With Quote