Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyc
First and foremost I am not talking about law. I'm talking about morals and ethics and knowing what is right and wrong and still doing the wrong thing. I don't give a huff what the law says, I do care about people knowing and doing the right thing regardless of law. Exactly as I stated it.
Your possession of my property without my authorization is immoral yes, it's wrong, you have stolen something from me.
|
You know Ken, we've had this dance many times before, and as usual you don't care about the letter of the law unless it benefits you. As we discussed before, you sell photograph taken of people without model releases because, under certain aspects of the law, it is not required. But tell me, how come the protection of that loophole is so relevant when it's you using it, yet similar legal loopholes become immoral regardless of the law when others use it?
You have taken someone's image and made a profit on it, without getting a model release. Does that make you a thief? How does that differ from ebooks?