View Single Post
Old 02-02-2010, 08:33 AM   #274
stustaff
Wizard
stustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it isstustaff knows what time it is
 
Posts: 1,055
Karma: 2110
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Derbyshire UK
Device: sony reader PRS505 and 600
Quote:
Originally Posted by smerrall View Post
Copyright taking care of your kids is one thing, but it gets ridiculous with the current laws. Lets take JD Salinger as a topical example. He wrote Catcher in the Rye in 1951 and very little since. That book took care of his wife and family for the following 60 years until his death. His now adult grandchildren may have children of their own and there will be perhaps another 3 generations earning money off a book written by their great-great-great-great-grandfather perhaps 125 years before their birth.

This is WAY more than taking care of your children and orders of magnitude more than those that framed the original laws intended.
If a man built a house and sold if for a $10 million dollar profit or just made $10million in his lifetime, Should that money go to his chindren and their children and their children and perhaps another 3 generations all earning interest from something that their great great great grandfather did 125 years earlier?
stustaff is offline   Reply With Quote