View Single Post
Old 02-01-2010, 01:31 AM   #212
schex86
Enthusiast
schex86 has learned how to read e-booksschex86 has learned how to read e-booksschex86 has learned how to read e-booksschex86 has learned how to read e-booksschex86 has learned how to read e-booksschex86 has learned how to read e-booksschex86 has learned how to read e-books
 
Posts: 48
Karma: 766
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Alaska
Device: Kindle 2, Blackberry Mobipocket Reader
Quote:
Originally Posted by PKFFW View Post
Doesn't this perfectly describe capitalism as well?

Cheers,
PKFFW
Not according to my understanding of a market economy, in which market forces are determined by the individual choices of the many. In fact, true open market capitalism is the exact opposite of communism.

However, in the case of crony capitalism, which I mentioned earlier, the collusion of special interest and gov't coercion combine to grant an economic advantage to groups or industries which would not otherwise survive in an open market economy, thus postponing the process of creative destruction so essential to capitalist innovation.

It could be said to be a form of communism, in which a self serving few dictate economic terms to the masses, but only in a small sector of the overall economy. Regardless of the rationale used to justify this, such arrangements always result in a net loss, as the capital allocation will always be handled in a less efficient manner than if the gov't interference had not occurred. This inefficiency is further exacerbated in scenarios such as our current copyright scheme, in which the interests of society are dismissed as irrelevant, and the exercise of the natural rights of its members labeled as "theft". Any arrangement must include the interests of all concerned, or it will invariably be ineffective.

No wonder the various publishers have struggled in their campaign to propagandize the public. Though the concept of modern "piracy" certainly benefits their bottom line, it goes against the basic understanding most people have in the US about sharing formation. Just like Ben Franklin and his free library and book sharing club, we see a great benefit in pooling our resources and sharing knowledge, art, what have you. It is how we believe society has advanced throughout history, and the past 100 years of copyright legislation is not going to change this.

Some might call it "theft", but I call it sharing for the benefit of all. Others might call it "hoarding", I call it the use of my own property and technology as I see fit, sans any control they might have arranged amongst themselves to have over me.
schex86 is offline   Reply With Quote