View Single Post
Old 01-29-2010, 04:26 PM   #163
CyGuy
Avid Reader
CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CyGuy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
CyGuy's Avatar
 
Posts: 769
Karma: 7777778
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: PocketBook 902, Galaxy Tab 2 7.0, ASUS TF700, and Cybook Gen III
Quote:
Originally Posted by llreader View Post
Music company executives have stated, on the record, that they think you should pay for the MP3 that you ripped from your CD to put in your iPod, and pay again if you copy the CD to play in your car, even if no one else listens to it. And that is not urban legend.
If that is true, that is the most insane thing I have heard in a long time. When I purchase a CD, I will listen to it when/where/how I like, period. I would not even consider paying for the same song over and over to have it on multiple devices, not even a slight chance. If they passed a law that says I did have to pay over and over for the same song, and I circumvented it, there would not be the slightest feelings of guilt on my part. I would certainly not be a criminal, even if they claimed I was.

Last edited by CyGuy; 01-29-2010 at 04:28 PM.
CyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote