Quote:
Originally Posted by calvin-c
Except that this claim isn't an accurate interpretation of the law. In fact, by presenting it as if it is, it *might* be construed as legal advice which, in many jurisdictions, would make *them* liable for prosecution-for practicing law without a license. (Don't have enough details to be sure though-for example, if the warning was written by a lawyer, whose copyright would be owned by the company per contract, then that might avoid such prosecution-if anybody was silly enough to file it.)
In any case, you need to be aware that it's actually a court's determination of what the law says that determines whether or not a given act is legal-not a company's interpretation.
|
Of course it's not an accurate interpretation of the law! Have you had your sense of humor removed or something? It was an obvious exaggeration, I mean, come on, how old are you? Do I have to PM you and everybody else who doesn't understand a joke before I tell one now?
This also is not an accurate example of actual copyright enforcement
Oh, and Robert DeNiro wasn't harmed in the making of my joke either. He can still afford luxury hotels and most of Hollywood can still afford hookers and cocaine, except for Gary Busey.