View Single Post
Old 01-26-2010, 07:19 PM   #49
netseeker
sleepless reader
netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
netseeker's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,763
Karma: 615547
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany, near Stuttgart
Device: Sony PRS-505, PB 360° & 302, nook wi-fi, Kindle 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyc View Post
Well then that's not it either, cause the owner of the copyright is definitely harmed when his property is taken without permission.
Well, once again we would have to define what the "harm" could be in this regard (copy of ebook). If we assume that the "thief" - without the possibility to commit the theft - would buy the content in question for sure, then there would be some kind of harm possible: at least a lost sale for the property owner. Without this assumption, there is no harm measurable imho. I guess that this discussion could end up in a mix of legal and moral facts and assumptions, though the question remains: Given that we can't measure or prove that a harm occured, how could that be parasitism?

Last edited by netseeker; 01-26-2010 at 07:22 PM.
netseeker is offline   Reply With Quote