View Single Post
Old 01-26-2010, 04:29 PM   #25
ShellShock
Wizard
ShellShock ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShellShock ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShellShock ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShellShock ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShellShock ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShellShock ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShellShock ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShellShock ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShellShock ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShellShock ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ShellShock ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ShellShock's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,178
Karma: 2431850
Join Date: Sep 2008
Device: IPad Mini 2 Retina
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
Because we'd like to encourage people to publish, even late in life, and if their heirs can't inherit those rights, why should someone on his deathbed bother publishing his memoirs? Why put his (hypothetically beloved) family through whatever media attention might result from them, if they won't get anything but stress from it?

Copyright is an *incentive* to produce & share creative/artistic/scientific content. Allowing inheritance of copyright is supposed to provide some incentive to publish in a case where there's little to no possibility of personal gain.

(That said, I want copyright lengths to go back to no more than a few decades, regardless of whether the author is alive.)
Yes I agree; 70 years after death is far too long. Author's death or 30 years after original publication, which ever is later, seems more appropriate to me.
ShellShock is offline   Reply With Quote