Thread: Scanner recommendation
View Single Post
Old 01-23-2010, 11:03 PM   #19
texasnightowl
Guru
texasnightowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.texasnightowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.texasnightowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.texasnightowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.texasnightowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.texasnightowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.texasnightowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.texasnightowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.texasnightowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.texasnightowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.texasnightowl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 799
Karma: 2873645
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Texas
Device: PW5, Oasis 3, K4B(NT), K3/KK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydog View Post
Indeed, but aren't most word processors, particularly Word, known for terrible HTML output?
Word is really really bad unless you choose the "filtered" html output...then it is better...at least comparatively speaking.
texasnightowl is offline   Reply With Quote