Thread: Fascinating NYT article on Sherlock Holmes copyright
View Single Post
Old 01-22-2010, 05:41 PM   #9
Katti's Cat
Wizard
Katti's Cat can program the VCR without an owner's manual.Katti's Cat can program the VCR without an owner's manual.Katti's Cat can program the VCR without an owner's manual.Katti's Cat can program the VCR without an owner's manual.Katti's Cat can program the VCR without an owner's manual.Katti's Cat can program the VCR without an owner's manual.Katti's Cat can program the VCR without an owner's manual.Katti's Cat can program the VCR without an owner's manual.Katti's Cat can program the VCR without an owner's manual.Katti's Cat can program the VCR without an owner's manual.Katti's Cat can program the VCR without an owner's manual.
 
Katti's Cat's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,259
Karma: 175640
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Brisbane Australia
Device: Sony PRS-600
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward View Post
Where's the truth? The stories, up to 1923 are P.D. in the US. The entire canon is P.D. in Life + 70 and Life + 50. Trademarking of the Characters have been denied. Just what does the guy claim to own?
That, my dear Watson, is the question.
Katti's Cat is offline   Reply With Quote