Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotbob
Um.... how can you know it has a "timeless" quality if it's only been around since 79?
I think for something to be "timeless" it has to be fairly old, yes. So, even your definition disagrees with you.
BOb
|
I disagree. Again, it's all subjective. Some of what some people call "classic" is absolute dreck. And this is part of the reason that classic is a really bad topic. It's not something that we can point to and say for sure that this is a classic. Some people will disagree. So it's best to have a topic for where books nominated either are or are not without t being someone's opinion. And yes, I do think HHG has a timelsss quality about it. Just because it's from 1979 does not mean it doesn't have such.