View Single Post
Old 01-18-2010, 11:10 AM   #113
vivaldirules
When's Doughnut Day?
vivaldirules ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vivaldirules ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vivaldirules ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vivaldirules ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vivaldirules ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vivaldirules ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vivaldirules ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vivaldirules ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vivaldirules ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vivaldirules ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vivaldirules ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
vivaldirules's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,059
Karma: 13675475
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Houston, TX, US
Device: Sony PRS-505, iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by mores View Post
But I wonder why you think the facial expressions were cartoonish - of course we do not have "real" 3m tall blue people to compare the movie to, but I thought the faces were pretty well done, not exaggerated or otherwise "unnatural". I think I remember reading that a lot of the money went into this "awesome" new 3D-face-expression technology.
Cartoonish might be a poor word choice, but I think I mentioned elsewhere here that I thought they did a better job on Gollum in LOTR than they did with Avatar as far as giving characters emotional facial expressions. In Avatar, about all I registered were "anger", "love", "fear", and "disappointment" which was a pretty limited set of emotions and it came off rather boring, I thought. There was hardly any emotion at all. In LOTR, it was really rather fascinating to see Gollum in the sequences where he fought with himself, and that was using technology that is now primitive compared to Avatar's.
vivaldirules is offline   Reply With Quote