Quote:
Originally Posted by astra
|
Except OLED is not designed to wipe the floor with LCD in terms of power consumption. The advantages of OLED relative to LCD are more for visual quality, display thinness and flexibility, and long-term costs.
And again, 122 hours is a ridiculous number from not only a practical standpoint, but also from a marketing one. It is 10x any conventional device, and is specific to the hour, then claim based on "general usage"? That's complete tosh. OLED screens on a video-capable tablet/reader device can conceivably achieve 12 hours, which is pretty excellent considering the limitations.
Assuming that any display, including e-papers, will suddenly magnify a video-capable device's battery life tenfold is ridiculous. Just wanting it to be does not make it so.
Of course, that's assuming your response was
serious...
