|
That guy is simply trolling.
He say that a screen is "too small to read on" even if he hasn't even tried one. As if there have never been books with 4", 3" and even 2" diagonal printed through the history of publishing (I remember a series of "pocket thrillers" published in Italy that could fit the small pocket of your jeans, and people indeed bought and read them).
The last picture he posted, also, smells like trolling from a mile. What is "sad" about having a device 5" diagonal?
The market allows you to choose among 9" devices, 8" devices, 7.1" devices, 6" devices and 5" devices. You are free to choose what suits you best, you just have to decide if you value reading space more than portability or vice versa. Do you want to read on large screens? The kindle DX is there for you, go buy one.
If you call me sad for my choice, I call you intellectually impaired for your lack of education.
(My reading device actually has a 6" screen and not a 5" screen, but I am considering buying a smaller one for increased portability)
|