View Single Post
Old 01-16-2010, 05:16 PM   #36
HorridRedDog
Addict
HorridRedDog once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.HorridRedDog once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.HorridRedDog once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.HorridRedDog once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.HorridRedDog once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.HorridRedDog once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.HorridRedDog once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.HorridRedDog once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.HorridRedDog once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.HorridRedDog once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.HorridRedDog once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.
 
HorridRedDog's Avatar
 
Posts: 322
Karma: 1592
Join Date: Nov 2009
Device: PRS-600 EB-1150
"Why are you bringing up "large, EVIL companies". No one is arguing about large evil companies."

Quote:
Originally Posted by PKFFW View Post
I think you'll find that with attitudes like marks', a lawsuit is often the only way a disadvantaged group like blind people can get any concessions.

Yes the blind will need assistance in order to stand a chance of simply receiving the same standard of education as a sighted person. For a university to then actively give an added advantage to sighted students, without any attempt at giving any sort of comparable tool to the blind is simply illegal under Anti-Discrimination laws.
PKFFW
Are you changing your mind then? "to then actively give an added advantage to sighted students....".

Seems EVIL to me.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"So what would have happened if the newly formed "Apple Computing Company" had been shut down for not creating a computer useable by the blind?"

"Has any company been shut down here?"

I'm sorry, did I say someone was shut down? "So what would have happened...."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Originally Posted by nabrum View Post
Really? You had better re-READ and possibly comprehend(?) the post above yours. He says that the ACB might be p****d because the blind might not be buying $5K machines. Sounds like a Republican greed thing vs a "liberal" thing.
Tisk, tisk, more EVIL greedy companies.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
So *no* students get free DXs...
Let's see, now:
Amazon got whatever publicity benefit they were going to get during the DX launch; they learned what they needed to learn about the higher-ed market, and they save a bit of cash.
And nobody will ever again dare *give* an ebook reader to students even as a test.
But the lawyers got paid nicely.
Yes, more greed and plotting by the EVIL Amazon company.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreadcptflint View Post
Nah fjtorres,

Amazon got a bunch of publicity and the appearence of being generous with out giving out DXs. They clearly got the big win out of the program. Not bad for a silly lawsuit.
Do you really see no hatred for big companies?

================================================== ======

Ok. You don't want the "sighted" students to have the use of the Kindle DX (even just in a study) if a blind, or legally blind, person can't use it.

Ok. What about lined notebooks for writing class notes in? Take them away too?



Let loose the callow youth....
HorridRedDog is offline   Reply With Quote