Thread: Seriousness Cross-belief poll
View Single Post
Old 01-16-2010, 08:10 AM   #12
WT Sharpe
Bah, humbug!
WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
WT Sharpe's Avatar
 
Posts: 39,072
Karma: 157049943
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, iPad Pro, & a Samsung Galaxy S9.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow View Post
'Vaccinations are a good idea' and 'Vaccinations can cause autism' aren't necessarily mutually exclusive. It's possible to agree with both if you think the benefits outweigh the risks.
That's true. Like I said, this isn't a scientific poll, but what I'm after is the position that comes closest. There's not room enough to clarify all the questions in the way I'd like, and if I did, I doubt seriously that many people would like to wade through all the qualifiers.

Having said that, if I ever make a similar poll in the future, perhaps a better wording of that question would be, "Vaccinations: worth the risks?" and "Vaccinations: too dangerous." This would have been better wording, especially in light of the fact that--to the best of my knowledge--no one is claiming that vaccinations are completely risk-free, any more than similar claims would be made for any other medical procedure or treatment.

Thanks for pointing that out.
WT Sharpe is offline   Reply With Quote