Quote:
Originally Posted by schex86
Of course, when we look at this in a modern context, it seems obvious that copyrights should now be extended to recognize the many specializations of Science and other useful arts. So, maps & charts, non-fiction books, technical drawings/illustrations, documentaries, software, and architectural designs should be included, [/b]while paintings, sculptures, most fiction books, most movies, most music, most dances, most plays, etc. should be excluded.[/b]
|
Only if you deem these
Arts to be of no use.
I would argue many, if not most, people would disagree with your de facto assertion that these Arts have no use.
Cheers,
PKFFW