View Single Post
Old 01-10-2010, 07:08 AM   #74
drofgnal
Wizard
drofgnal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.drofgnal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.drofgnal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.drofgnal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.drofgnal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.drofgnal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.drofgnal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.drofgnal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.drofgnal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.drofgnal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.drofgnal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,403
Karma: 10519918
Join Date: Dec 2009
Device: Ipad Pro/Kindle Oasis 3/iPhone 13 Pro Max
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kali Yuga View Post
Well, that works out just swell... when you're a writer who already has a reputation.

I won't say that working with a publisher is the only way to build a reputation, but so far the biggest successes of Internet-based self-promotion are things like Chocolate Rain and the Tron Guy. I.e. I expect that in the future, building and managing a truly national or international following is still going to require resources (finances, skills, networking, PR, marketing, etc) far beyond the ken of most individual creators.

In addition, some type of filtration is always going to be required. Self-published works are, for better or worse, an undifferentiated seething mass of works that takes tremendous effort to wade through. Again this does not need to exclusively lie in the hands of the publishers, but they do have more experience and fewer conflicts of interest with this task than, say, retailers.

As to the idea that "publishers want control," that's sort of like saying "dogs want food." Everyone in the process wants control over numerous aspects -- publishers, retailers, authors, distributors, critics and readers. That's just a given; i.e. there is nothing wrong with maneuvers to gain control, as long as they are basically done legally and honor the existing rights. E.g. to me, pirating a book because it's out in hardcover but not an ebook isn't a legit protest, because it hurts not only the publishers, but also the retailers and, most importantly, the author. Or a retailer can slash ebook prices to pressure publishers to permanently lower ebook wholesale pricing, but can't legitimately withhold payments in order to force the same change.
I said 'are not needed'. That is different than not desired. If e-books come to dominate then the era of 'there is no other way' because only a publisher can line up printing, distribution, etc will be gone. Do they still have a roll? Of course, their roll will just have to change. You still need editors, people to do electronic formatting, and marketing the authors work. But, their role may change, they may not be so firmly the 'middle man'. This is what I see them fearing, hence the desire to keep hardback front and center and relegate ebook to paperback status.
drofgnal is offline   Reply With Quote