Quote:
Originally Posted by klikklak
But you've heard of Chomsky?  Not that I agree with him 100%, but he's a high profile libertarian socialist. And yes, past hundred years proved you right in many ways, but we'll see what this century will bring. Out of the existing societies I think I prefer social democracy (a form of socialism), it's been relatively humane to all members of society. Democracy is very important, I think we both agree on this, but those on the libertarian left generally think so.
I have a question for you, what should we do when secretaries, shop clerks, driving professions, maids etc. lose their jobs? Those can be automated you know. |
Libertarian isn't a label I usually associate with Chomsky, but if that's how he chooses to self-identify, so be it. As a freedom-loving person, there are certain aspects of libertarianism that appeal to me. In this country, however, Libertarians are very much dominated by conservative ways of thinking, even though much of they advocate (legalization of drugs and prostitution, for example) isn't. It's hard to picture Ron Paul and Norm Chomsky being on the same side of too many issues.
As for democracy, it only works well with an educated citizenry, and this is one place where the U.S. has fallen down on the job. The solution there, of course, isn't less democracy, but better education. How to accomplish that is another issue altogether. Good education doesn't come cheap, and it's hard to get elected when your opponent is promising to cut taxes.
Socialism? As long as there are people in need, people who can't compete, people who are infirm or otherwise disadvantaged, there will be a need for socialism. And for some things socialism seems to be the best solution for the entire society. Who would like to see library systems run by corporations?
As for the question you pose, while it is an excellent one, it cannot be addressed in a few words, and I believe we have already strayed too far off-topic. I will say that it is a question that has long concerned me, and one that may ultimately demand a radical solution involving a major paradigm shift in our thinking if we are to have a solution that is both effective and humane.
Perhaps you may want to start another thread in which this question can be properly addressed.